Ismat Jarin (University of California, Irvine), Olivia Figueira (University of California, Irvine), Yu Duan (University of California, Irvine), Tu Le (The University of Alabama), Athina Markopoulou (University of California, Irvine)

Virtual reality (VR) platforms and apps collect users’ sensor data, including motion, facial, eye, and hand data, in abstracted form. These data may expose users to unique privacy risks without their knowledge or meaningful awareness, yet the extent of these risks remains understudied. To address this gap, we propose VR ProfiLens, a framework to study user profiling based on VR sensor data and the resulting privacy risks across consumer VR apps. To systematically study this problem, we first develop a taxonomy rooted in CCPA definition of personal information and expanded it by sensor groups, apps, and threat contexts to identify user attributes at risk. Then, we conduct a user study in which we collect VR sensor data from four sensor groups from real users interacting with 10 popular consumer VR apps, followed by a survey. We design and apply an analysis pipeline to demonstrate the feasibility of inferring user attributes using these data. Our results demonstrate that user attributes, including sensitive personal information, have a moderately high to high risk (with up to ∼ 90% F1 score) of being inferred from the abstracted sensor data. Through feature analysis, we further identify correlations among app groups and sensor groups in inferring user attributes. Our findings highlight risks to users, including privacy loss, tracking, targeted advertising, and safety threats. Finally, we discuss both design implications and regulatory recommendations to enhance transparency and better protect users’ privacy in VR.

View More Papers

coucouArray ( [post_type] => ndss-paper [post_status] => publish [posts_per_page] => 4 [orderby] => rand [tax_query] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [taxonomy] => category [field] => id [terms] => Array ( [0] => 132 [1] => 32 ) ) ) [post__not_in] => Array ( [0] => 23213 ) )

A Comparison of Three Approaches to Assist Users in...

Michael Clark (Brigham Young University), Scott Ruoti (The University of Tennessee), Michael Mendoza (Imperial College London), Kent Seamons (Brigham Young University)

Read More

Cross-National Study on Phishing Resilience

Shakthidhar Reddy Gopavaram (Indiana University), Jayati Dev (Indiana University), Marthie Grobler (CSIRO’s Data61), DongInn Kim (Indiana University), Sanchari Das (University of Denver), L. Jean Camp (Indiana University)

Read More

Do Privacy Labels Answer Users' Privacy Questions?

Shikun Zhang, Norman Sadeh (Carnegie Mellon University)

Read More

More than Meets the Eye: Understanding the Effect of...

Mete Harun Akcay (Abo Academy University), Siddarth Prakash Rao (Nokia Bell Labs), Alexandros Bakas (Nokia Bell Labs), Buse Atli (Linkoping University)

Read More

Privacy Starts with UI: Privacy Patterns and Designer Perspectives in UI/UX Practice

Anxhela Maloku (Technical University of Munich), Alexandra Klymenko (Technical University of Munich), Stephen Meisenbacher (Technical University of Munich), Florian Matthes (Technical University of Munich)

Vision: Profiling Human Attackers: Personality and Behavioral Patterns in Deceptive Multi-Stage CTF Challenges

Khalid Alasiri (School of Computing and Augmented Intelligence Arizona State University), Rakibul Hasan (School of Computing and Augmented Intelligence Arizona State University)

From Underground to Mainstream Marketplaces: Measuring AI-Enabled NSFW Deepfakes on Fiverr

Mohamed Moustafa Dawoud (University of California, Santa Cruz), Alejandro Cuevas (Princeton University), Ram Sundara Raman (University of California, Santa Cruz)