Matteo Marini (Sapienza University of Rome), Daniele Cono D'Elia (Sapienza University of Rome), Mathias Payer (EPFL), Leonardo Querzoni (Sapienza University of Rome)

Fuzzing evolved into the most popular technique to detect bugs in software. Its combination with sanitizers has shown tremendous efficacy in uncovering memory safety errors, such as buffer overflows, that haunt C and C++ programmers. However, an important class of such issues, the so-called use-of-uninitialized-memory (UUM) errors, struggles to gain similar benefits from fuzzing endeavors. The only fuzzer-compatible UUM sanitizer available to date, MSan, requires that all libraries are fully instrumented. Unlike address sanitization, for which partial instrumentation results in false negatives (missed detection of bugs), UUM sanitizers require complete instrumentation to avoid false positives, hampering testing at scale. Yet, full-stack compiler-based instrumentation can be a daunting prospect for compatibility and practicality. As a result, many programs are left untested for UUM bugs.

In this paper, we propose an efficient multi-layer, opportunistic design that does not require (source-based) recompilation of all code without harming accuracy. The multiplicity of executions when fuzzing offers us the opportunity to learn what any encountered false positive looks like, and later ignore them when we meet them again with new test cases. Such an avenue is feasible only if one can resort to fast techniques to effectively discriminate candidate errors, or false negatives will then occur.

We show how to realize this design by using the dynamic binary translation of QEMU for compatibility and lightweight code analysis techniques to achieve scalability and accuracy. As a result, we obtain a fuzzer-friendly, performant sanitizer, QMSan, that effectively tackles current practicality challenges of UUM error detection. On a collection of 10 open-source and 5 proprietary programs, QMSan exposed 44 new UUM bugs. In our tests, QMSan incurs slowdowns of 1.51x over QEMU and 1.55x over the compiler-based instrumentation of MSan, showing no false positives and false negatives. QMSan is open-source.

View More Papers

Impact Tracing: Identifying the Culprit of Misinformation in Encrypted...

Zhongming Wang (Chongqing University), Tao Xiang (Chongqing University), Xiaoguo Li (Chongqing University), Biwen Chen (Chongqing University), Guomin Yang (Singapore Management University), Chuan Ma (Chongqing University), Robert H. Deng (Singapore Management University)

Read More

Understanding Miniapp Malware: Identification, Dissection, and Characterization

Yuqing Yang (The Ohio State University), Yue Zhang (Drexel University), Zhiqiang Lin (The Ohio State University)

Read More

YuraScanner: Leveraging LLMs for Task-driven Web App Scanning

Aleksei Stafeev (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security), Tim Recktenwald (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security), Gianluca De Stefano (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security), Soheil Khodayari (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security), Giancarlo Pellegrino (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security)

Read More

LeakLess: Selective Data Protection against Memory Leakage Attacks for...

Maryam Rostamipoor (Stony Brook University), Seyedhamed Ghavamnia (University of Connecticut), Michalis Polychronakis (Stony Brook University)

Read More