Fannv He (National Computer Network Intrusion Protection Center, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China), Yan Jia (DISSec, College of Cyber Science, Nankai University, China), Jiayu Zhao (National Computer Network Intrusion Protection Center, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China), Yue Fang (National Computer Network Intrusion Protection Center, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China), Jice Wang (National Computer Network Intrusion Protection Center, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China), Mengyue Feng (National Computer Network Intrusion Protection Center, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China), Peng Liu (College of Information Sciences and Technology, Pennsylvania State University, USA), Yuqing Zhang (National Computer Network Intrusion Protection Center, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China; Hangzhou Institute of Technology & School of Cyber Engineering, Xidian University, China; School of Cyberspace Security, Hainan University, China)

Authentication is one of the established practices to ensure user security. Personally identifiable information (PII), such as national identity card number (ID number) and bank card number, is used widely in China's mobile apps as an additional secret to authenticate users, i.e., PII-as-Factor Authentication (PaFA). In this paper, we found a new threat that calls on the cautiousness of PaFA: the simultaneous usages and business-related interactions of apps make the authentication strength of a target app weaker than designed. An adversary, who knows fewer authentication factors (only SMS OTP) than a PaFA system required, can break the authentication by gathering information or abusing cross-app authorization from other apps. To systematically study the potential risks, we proposed a semi-automatic system, MAGGIE, to evaluate the security of PaFA in target apps. By measuring 234 real-world apps in Chinese app markets with the help of MAGGIE, we found 75.4% of apps that deployed PaFA can be bypassed, including the popular and sensitive ones (e.g., AliPay, WeChat, UnionPay), leading to severe consequences like hijack user accounts and making unauthorized purchases. Additionally, we conducted a survey to demonstrate the practical implications of the new risk on users. Finally, we reported our findings to the vendors and provided several mitigation measures.

View More Papers

The CURE to Vulnerabilities in RPKI Validation

Donika Mirdita (Technische Universität Darmstadt), Haya Schulmann (Goethe-Universität Frankfurt), Niklas Vogel (Goethe-Universität Frankfurt), Michael Waidner (Technische Universität Darmstadt, Fraunhofer SIT)

Read More

VETEOS: Statically Vetting EOSIO Contracts for the “Groundhog Day”...

Levi Taiji Li (University of Utah), Ningyu He (Peking University), Haoyu Wang (Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Mu Zhang (University of Utah)

Read More

DEMASQ: Unmasking the ChatGPT Wordsmith

Kavita Kumari (Technical University of Darmstadt, Germany), Alessandro Pegoraro (Technical University of Darmstadt), Hossein Fereidooni (Technische Universität Darmstadt), Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi (Technical University of Darmstadt)

Read More

Experimental Analyses of the Physical Surveillance Risks in Client-Side...

Ashish Hooda (University of Wisconsin-Madison), Andrey Labunets (UC San Diego), Tadayoshi Kohno (University of Washington), Earlence Fernandes (UC San Diego)

Read More