Zhongming Wang (Chongqing University), Tao Xiang (Chongqing University), Xiaoguo Li (Chongqing University), Biwen Chen (Chongqing University), Guomin Yang (Singapore Management University), Chuan Ma (Chongqing University), Robert H. Deng (Singapore Management University)

Encrypted messaging systems obstruct content moderation, although they provide end-to-end security. As a result, misinformation proliferates in these systems, thereby exacerbating online hate and harassment. The paradigm of ``Reporting-then-Tracing" shows great potential in mitigating the spread of misinformation. For instance, textit{message traceback} (CCS'19) traces all the dissemination paths of a message, while textit{source tracing} (CCS'21) traces its originator.
However, message traceback lacks privacy preservation for non-influential users (e.g., users who only receive the message once), while source tracing maintains privacy but only provides limited traceability.

In this paper, we initiate the study of textit{impact tracing}. Intuitively, impact tracing traces influential spreaders central to disseminating misinformation while providing privacy protection for non-influential users. We introduce noises to hide non-influential users and demonstrate that these noises do not hinder the identification of influential spreaders. Then, we formally prove our scheme's security and show it achieves differential privacy protection for non-influential users.
Additionally, we define three metrics to evaluate its traceability, correctness, and privacy using real-world datasets. The experimental results show that our scheme identifies the most influential spreaders with accuracy from 82% to 99% as the amount of noise varies. Meanwhile, our scheme requires only a 6-byte platform storage overhead for each message while maintaining a low messaging latency ($<$ 0.25ms).

View More Papers

Towards LLM-Assisted Vulnerability Detection and Repair for Open-Source 5G...

Rupam Patir (University at Buffalo), Qiqing Huang (University at Buffalo), Keyan Guo (University at Buffalo), Wanda Guo (Texas A&M University), Guofei Gu (Texas A&M University), Haipeng Cai (University at Buffalo), Hongxin Hu (University at Buffalo)

Read More

Hidden and Lost Control: on Security Design Risks in...

Haoqiang Wang, Yiwei Fang (Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences; School of Cyber Security, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; Indiana University Bloomington), Yichen Liu (Indiana University Bloomington), Ze Jin (Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences; School of Cyber Security, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences; Indiana University Bloomington), Emma Delph…

Read More

LeakLess: Selective Data Protection against Memory Leakage Attacks for...

Maryam Rostamipoor (Stony Brook University), Seyedhamed Ghavamnia (University of Connecticut), Michalis Polychronakis (Stony Brook University)

Read More

GAP-Diff: Protecting JPEG-Compressed Images from Diffusion-based Facial Customization

Haotian Zhu (Nanjing University of Science and Technology), Shuchao Pang (Nanjing University of Science and Technology), Zhigang Lu (Western Sydney University), Yongbin Zhou (Nanjing University of Science and Technology), Minhui Xue (CSIRO's Data61)

Read More