Qi Ling (Purdue University), Yujun Liang (Tsinghua University), Yi Ren (Tsinghua University), Baris Kasikci (University of Washington and Google), Shuwen Deng (Tsinghua University)

Since their emergence in 2018, speculative execution attacks have proven difficult to fully prevent without substantial performance overhead. This is because most mitigations hurt modern processors' speculative nature, which is essential to many optimization techniques. To address this, numerous scanners have been developed to identify vulnerable code snippets (speculative gadgets) within software applications, allowing mitigations to be applied selectively and thereby minimizing performance degradation.

In this paper, we show that existing speculative gadget scanners lack accuracy, often misclassifying gadgets due to limited modeling of timing properties. Instead, we identify another fundamental condition intrinsic to all speculative attacks—the timing requirement as a race condition inside the gadget. Specifically, the attacker must optimize the race condition between speculated authorization and secret leakage to successfully exploit the gadget. Therefore, we introduce GadgetMeter, a framework designed to quantitatively gauge the exploitability of speculative gadgets based on their timing property. We systematically explore the attacker's power to optimize the race condition inside gadgets (windowing power). A Directed Acyclic Instruction Graph is used to model timing conditions and static analysis and runtime testing are combined to optimize attack patterns and quantify gadget vulnerability. We use GadgetMeter to evaluate gadgets in a wide range of software, including six real-world applications and the Linux kernel. Our result shows that GadgetMeter can accurately identify exploitable speculative gadgets and quantify their vulnerability level, identifying 471 gadgets reported by GadgetMeter works as unexploitable.

View More Papers

TWINFUZZ: Differential Testing of Video Hardware Acceleration Stacks

Matteo Leonelli (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security), Addison Crump (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security), Meng Wang (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security), Florian Bauckholt (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security), Keno Hassler (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security), Ali Abbasi (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security), Thorsten Holz (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information…

Read More

Secure Transformer Inference Made Non-interactive

Jiawen Zhang (Zhejiang University), Xinpeng Yang (Zhejiang University), Lipeng He (University of Waterloo), Kejia Chen (Zhejiang University), Wen-jie Lu (Zhejiang University), Yinghao Wang (Zhejiang University), Xiaoyang Hou (Zhejiang University), Jian Liu (Zhejiang University), Kui Ren (Zhejiang University), Xiaohu Yang (Zhejiang University)

Read More

Do We Really Need to Design New Byzantine-robust Aggregation...

Minghong Fang (University of Louisville), Seyedsina Nabavirazavi (Florida International University), Zhuqing Liu (University of North Texas), Wei Sun (Wichita State University), Sundararaja Iyengar (Florida International University), Haibo Yang (Rochester Institute of Technology)

Read More

PropertyGPT: LLM-driven Formal Verification of Smart Contracts through Retrieval-Augmented...

Ye Liu (Singapore Management University), Yue Xue (MetaTrust Labs), Daoyuan Wu (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology), Yuqiang Sun (Nanyang Technological University), Yi Li (Nanyang Technological University), Miaolei Shi (MetaTrust Labs), Yang Liu (Nanyang Technological University)

Read More