Venkat Arun (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), Aniket Kate (Purdue University), Deepak Garg (Max Planck Institute for Software Systems), Peter Druschel (Max Planck Institute for Software Systems), Bobby Bhattacharjee (University of Maryland)

For fear of retribution, the victim of a crime may be willing to report it only if other victims of the same perpetrator also step forward. Common examples include identifying oneself as the victim of sexual harassment by a person in a position of authority or accusing an influential politician, an authoritarian government or ones own employer of corruption. To handle such situations, legal literature has proposed the concept of an allegation escrow, a neutral third-party that collects allegations anonymously, matches allegations against each other, and de-anonymizes allegers only after de-anonymity thresholds (in terms of number of co-allegers), pre-specified by the allegers, are reached.

An allegation escrow can be realized as a single trusted third party; however, this party must be trusted to keep the identity of the alleger and content of the allegation private. To address this problem, this paper introduces Secure Allegation Escrows (SAE, pronounced ``say''). A SAE is a group of parties with independent interests and motives, acting jointly as an escrow for collecting allegations from individuals, matching the allegations, and de-anonymizing the allegations when designated thresholds are reached. By design, SAEs provide a very strong property: No less than a majority of parties constituting a SAE can de-anonymize or disclose the content of an allegation without a sufficient number of matching allegations (even in collusion with any number of other allegers). Once a sufficient number of matching allegations exist, all parties can simultaneously disclose the allegation with a verifiable proof of the allegers' identities. We describe how SAEs can be constructed using a novel authentication protocol and a novel allegation matching and bucketing algorithm, provide formal proofs of the security of our constructions, and provide an evaluation of a prototype implementation, demonstrating feasibility in practice.

View More Papers

ConTExT: A Generic Approach for Mitigating Spectre

Michael Schwarz (Graz University of Technology), Moritz Lipp (Graz University of Technology), Claudio Canella (Graz University of Technology), Robert Schilling (Graz University of Technology and Know-Center GmbH), Florian Kargl (Graz University of Technology), Daniel Gruss (Graz University of Technology)

Read More

SurfingAttack: Interactive Hidden Attack on Voice Assistants Using Ultrasonic...

Qiben Yan (Michigan State University), Kehai Liu (Chinese Academy of Sciences), Qin Zhou (University of Nebraska-Lincoln), Hanqing Guo (Michigan State University), Ning Zhang (Washington University in St. Louis)

Read More

Encrypted DNS –> Privacy? A Traffic Analysis Perspective

Sandra Siby (EPFL), Marc Juarez (University of Southern California), Claudia Diaz (imec-COSIC KU Leuven), Narseo Vallina-Rodriguez (IMDEA Networks Institute), Carmela Troncoso (EPFL)

Read More

CloudLeak: Large-Scale Deep Learning Models Stealing Through Adversarial Examples

Honggang Yu (University of Florida), Kaichen Yang (University of Florida), Teng Zhang (University of Central Florida), Yun-Yun Tsai (National Tsing Hua University), Tsung-Yi Ho (National Tsing Hua University), Yier Jin (University of Florida)

Read More