Jaewon Hur (Seoul National University), Juheon Yi (Nokia Bell Labs, Cambridge, UK), Cheolwoo Myung (Seoul National University), Sangyun Kim (Seoul National University), Youngki Lee (Seoul National University), Byoungyoung Lee (Seoul National University)

Sharing training data for deep learning raises critical concerns about data leakage, as third-party AI developers take full control over the data once it is handed over to them. The problem becomes even worse if the model trained using the data should be returned to the third-party AI developers - e.g., healthcare startup training its own model using the medical data rented from a hospital. In this case, the malicious developers can easily leak the training data through the model as he can construct an arbitrary data flow between them - e.g., directly encoding raw training data into the model, or stealthily biasing the model to resemble the training data. However, current model training frameworks do not provide any protection to prevent such training data leakage, allowing the untrusted AI developers to leak the data without any restriction.

This paper proposes DLBox, a new model training framework to minimize the attack vectors raised by untrusted AI developers. Since it is infeasible to completely prevent data leakage through the model, the goal of DLBox is to allow only a benign model training such that the data leakage through invalid paths are minimized. The key insight of DLBox is that the model training is a statistical process of learning common patterns from a dataset. Based on it, DLBox defines DGM-Rules, which determine whether a model training code from a developer is benign or not. Then, DLBox leverages confidential computing to redesign current model training framework, enforcing only DGM-Rules-based training. Therefore, untrusted AI developers are strictly limited to obtain only the benignly trained model, prohibited from intentionally leaking the data. We implemented the prototype of DLBox on PyTorch with AMD SEV-SNP, and demonstrated that DLBox eliminates large attack vectors by preventing previous attacks (e.g., data encoding, and gradient inversion) while imposing minimal performance overhead.

View More Papers

Can a Cybersecurity Question Answering Assistant Help Change User...

Lea Duesterwald (Carnegie Mellon University), Ian Yang (Carnegie Mellon University), Norman Sadeh (Carnegie Mellon University)

Read More

Automatic Library Fuzzing through API Relation Evolvement

Jiayi Lin (The University of Hong Kong), Qingyu Zhang (The University of Hong Kong), Junzhe Li (The University of Hong Kong), Chenxin Sun (The University of Hong Kong), Hao Zhou (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University), Changhua Luo (The University of Hong Kong), Chenxiong Qian (The University of Hong Kong)

Read More

ScopeVerif: Analyzing the Security of Android’s Scoped Storage via...

Zeyu Lei (Purdue University), Güliz Seray Tuncay (Google), Beatrice Carissa Williem (Purdue University), Z. Berkay Celik (Purdue University), Antonio Bianchi (Purdue University)

Read More

The Road to Trust: Building Enclaves within Confidential VMs

Wenhao Wang (Key Laboratory of Cyberspace Security Defense, Institute of Information Engineering, CAS), Linke Song (Key Laboratory of Cyberspace Security Defense, Institute of Information Engineering, CAS), Benshan Mei (Key Laboratory of Cyberspace Security Defense, Institute of Information Engineering, CAS), Shuang Liu (Ant Group), Shijun Zhao (Key Laboratory of Cyberspace Security Defense, Institute of Information Engineering,…

Read More