Platon Kotzias (Norton Research Group, BforeAI), Michalis Pachilakis (Norton Research Group, Computer Science Department University of Crete), Javier Aldana Iuit (Norton Research Group), Juan Caballero (IMDEA Software Institute), Iskander Sanchez-Rola (Norton Research Group), Leyla Bilge (Norton Research Group)

Online scams have become a top threat for Internet users, inflicting $10 billion in losses in 2023 only in the US. Prior work has studied specific scam types, but no work has compared different scam types. In this work, we perform what we believe is the first study of the exposure of end users to different types of online scams. We examine seven popular scam types: shopping, financial, cryptocurrency, gambling, dating, funds recovery, and employment scams. To quantify end-user exposure, we search for observations of 607K scam domains over a period of several months by millions of desktop and mobile devices belonging to customers of a large cybersecurity vendor. We classify the scam domains into the seven scam types and measure for each scam type the exposure of end users, geographical variations, scam domain lifetime, and the promotion of scam websites through online advertisements.

We examine 25.1M IP addresses accessing over 414K scam domains. On a daily basis, 149K devices are exposed to online scams, with an average of 101K (0.8%) of desktop devices being exposed compared to 48K (0.3%) of mobile devices. Shopping scams are the most prevalent scam type, being observed by a total of 10.2M IPs, followed by cryptocurrency scams, observed by 653K IPs. After being observed in the telemetry, the scam domains remain alive for a median of 11 days. In at least 9.2M (13.3%) of all scam observations users followed an advertisement. These ads are largely (59%) hosted on social media, with Facebook being the preferred source.

View More Papers

JBomAudit: Assessing the Landscape, Compliance, and Security Implications of...

Yue Xiao (IBM Research), Dhilung Kirat (IBM Research), Douglas Lee Schales (IBM Research), Jiyong Jang (IBM Research), Luyi Xing (Indiana University Bloomington), Xiaojing Liao (Indiana University)

Read More

ReThink: Reveal the Threat of Electromagnetic Interference on Power...

Fengchen Yang (Zhejiang University; ZJU QI-ANXIN IoT Security Joint Labratory), Zihao Dan (Zhejiang University; ZJU QI-ANXIN IoT Security Joint Labratory), Kaikai Pan (Zhejiang University; ZJU QI-ANXIN IoT Security Joint Labratory), Chen Yan (Zhejiang University; ZJU QI-ANXIN IoT Security Joint Labratory), Xiaoyu Ji (Zhejiang University; ZJU QI-ANXIN IoT Security Joint Labratory), Wenyuan Xu (Zhejiang University; ZJU…

Read More

TrajDeleter: Enabling Trajectory Forgetting in Offline Reinforcement Learning Agents

Chen Gong (University of Vriginia), Kecen Li (Chinese Academy of Sciences), Jin Yao (University of Virginia), Tianhao Wang (University of Virginia)

Read More

Revealing the Black Box of Device Search Engine: Scanning...

Mengying Wu (Fudan University), Geng Hong (Fudan University), Jinsong Chen (Fudan University), Qi Liu (Fudan University), Shujun Tang (QI-ANXIN Technology Research Institute; Tsinghua University), Youhao Li (QI-ANXIN Technology Research Institute), Baojun Liu (Tsinghua University), Haixin Duan (Tsinghua University; Quancheng Laboratory), Min Yang (Fudan University)

Read More