Yunyi Zhang (Tsinghua University), Shibo Cui (Tsinghua University), Baojun Liu (Tsinghua University), Jingkai Yu (Tsinghua University), Min Zhang (National University of Defense Technology), Fan Shi (National University of Defense Technology), Han Zheng (TrustAl Pte. Ltd.)

LLM applications (i.e., LLM apps) leverage the powerful capabilities of LLMs to provide users with customized services, revolutionizing traditional application development. While the increasing prevalence of LLM-powered applications provides users with unprecedented convenience, it also brings forth new security challenges. For such an emerging ecosystem, the security community lacks sufficient understanding of the LLM application ecosystem, especially regarding the capability boundaries of the applications themselves.

In this paper, we systematically analyzed the new development paradigm and defined the concept of the LLM app capability space. We also uncovered potential new risks beyond jailbreak that arise from ambiguous capability boundaries in real-world scenarios, namely, capability downgrade and upgrade. To evaluate the impact of these risks, we designed and implemented an LLM app capability evaluation framework, LLMApp-Eval. First, we collected application metadata across 4 platforms and conducted a cross-platform ecosystem analysis. Then, we evaluated the risks for 199 popular applications among 4 platforms and 6 open-source LLMs. We identified that 178 (89.45%) potentially affected applications, which can perform tasks from more than 15 scenarios or be malicious. We even found 17 applications in our study that executed malicious tasks directly, without applying any adversarial rewriting. Furthermore, our experiments also reveal a positive correlation between the quality of prompt design and application robustness. We found that well-designed prompts enhance security, while poorly designed ones can facilitate abuse. We hope our work inspires the community to focus on the real-world risks of LLM applications and foster the development of a more robust LLM application ecosystem.

View More Papers

A Unified Defense Framework Against Membership Inference in Federated...

Liwei Zhang (Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications), Linghui Li (Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications), Xiaotian Si (Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications), Ziduo Guo (Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications), Xingwu Wang (Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications), Kaiguo Yuan (Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications), Bingyu Li (School of Cyber Science and…

Read More

NeuroStrike: Neuron-Level Attacks on Aligned LLMs

Lichao Wu (Technical University of Darmstadt), Sasha Behrouzi (Technical University of Darmstadt), Mohamadreza Rostami (Technical University of Darmstadt), Maximilian Thang (Technical University of Darmstadt), Stjepan Picek (University of Zagreb & Radboud University), Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi (Technical University of Darmstadt)

Read More

Chasing Shadows: Pitfalls in LLM Security Research

Jonathan Evertz (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security), Niklas Risse (Max Planck Institute for Security and Privacy), Nicolai Neuer (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology), Andreas Müller (Ruhr University Bochum), Philipp Normann (TU Wien), Gaetano Sapia (Max Planck Institute for Security and Privacy), Srishti Gupta (Sapienza University of Rome), David Pape (CISPA Helmholtz Center for Information Security),…

Read More