Andrew Searles (University of California Irvine), Renascence Tarafder Prapty (University of California Irvine), Gene Tsudik (University of California Irvine)

Since 2003, CAPTCHAS have been widely used as a barrier against bots, while simultaneously annoying great multitudes of users worldwide. As the use of CAPTCHAS grew, techniques to defeat or bypass them kept improving. In response, CAPTCHAS themselves evolved in terms of sophistication and diversity, becoming increasingly difficult to solve for both bots and humans. Given this long-standing and still-ongoing arms race, it is important to investigate usability, solving performance, and user perceptions of modern CAPTCHAS. In this work, we do so via a large scale (over 3,600 distinct users) 13-month realworld user study and post-study survey. The study, conducted at a large public university, is based on a live account creation and password recovery service with currently prevalent CAPTCHA type: reCAPTCHAv2.

Results show that, with more attempts, users improve in solving checkbox CAPTCHAS. For website developers and user study designers, results indicate that the website context, i.e., whether the service is password recovery or account creation, directly influences (with statistically significant differences) CAPTCHA solving times. We consider the impact of participants’ major and education level, showing that certain majors exhibit better performance, while, in general, education level has a direct impact on solving time. Unsurprisingly, we discover that participants find image CAPTCHAS to be annoying, while checkbox CAPTCHAS are perceived as easy. We also show that, rated via System Usability Scale (SUS), image CAPTCHAS are viewed as “OK”, while checkbox CAPTCHAS are viewed as “good”.

Finally, we also explore the cost and security of reCAPTCHAv2 and conclude that it comes at an immense cost and offers practically no security. Overall, we believe that this study’s results prompt a natural conclusion: reCAPTCHAv2 and similar reCAPTCHA technology should be deprecated.

View More Papers

Replication: Do We Snooze If We Can't Lose? Modelling...

Karoline Busse (University of Bonn); Dominik Wermke (Leibniz University Hannover); Sabrina Amft (University of Bonn); Sascha Fahl (Leibniz University Hannover); Emanuel von Zezschwitz, Matthew Smith (University of Bonn)

Read More

DLBox: New Model Training Framework for Protecting Training Data

Jaewon Hur (Seoul National University), Juheon Yi (Nokia Bell Labs, Cambridge, UK), Cheolwoo Myung (Seoul National University), Sangyun Kim (Seoul National University), Youngki Lee (Seoul National University), Byoungyoung Lee (Seoul National University)

Read More

Vision: “AccessFormer”: Feedback-Driven Access Control Policy

Sakuna Harinda Jayasundara, Nalin Asanka Gamagedara Arachchilage, Giovanni Russello (University of Auckland)

Read More

PQConnect: Automated Post-Quantum End-to-End Tunnels

Daniel J. Bernstein (University of Illinois at Chicago and Academia Sinica), Tanja Lange (Eindhoven University of Technology amd Academia Sinica), Jonathan Levin (Academia Sinica and Eindhoven University of Technology), Bo-Yin Yang (Academia Sinica)

Read More