Rei Yamagishi, Shinya Sasa, and Shota Fujii (Hitachi, Ltd.)

Codes automatically generated by large-scale language models are expected to be used in software development. A previous study verified the security of 21 types of code generated by ChatGPT and found that ChatGPT sometimes generates vulnerable code. On the other hand, although ChatGPT produces different output depending on the input language, the effect on the security of the generated code is not clear. Thus, there is concern that non-native English-speaking developers may generate insecure code or be forced to bear unnecessary burdens. To investigate the effect of language differences on code security, we instructed ChatGPT to generate code in English and Japanese, each with the same content, and generated a total of 450 codes under six different conditions. Our analysis showed that insecure codes were generated in both English and Japanese, but in most cases they were independent of the input language. In addition, the results of validating the same content in different programming languages suggested that the security of the code tends to depend on the security and usability of the API provided by the programming language of the output.

View More Papers

Predictive Context-sensitive Fuzzing

Pietro Borrello (Sapienza University of Rome), Andrea Fioraldi (EURECOM), Daniele Cono D'Elia (Sapienza University of Rome), Davide Balzarotti (Eurecom), Leonardo Querzoni (Sapienza University of Rome), Cristiano Giuffrida (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Read More

Exploring the Influence of Prompts in LLMs for Security-Related...

Weiheng Bai (University of Minnesota), Qiushi Wu (IBM Research), Kefu Wu, Kangjie Lu (University of Minnesota)

Read More

Certificate Transparency Revisited: The Public Inspections on Third-party Monitors

Aozhuo Sun (Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Jingqiang Lin (School of Cyber Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China), Wei Wang (Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Zeyan Liu (The University of Kansas), Bingyu Li (School of Cyber Science and Technology, Beihang University), Shushang Wen (School of…

Read More