Andrew Roberts (Tallinn University of Technology), Mohsen Malayjerdi (Tallinn University of Technology), Mauro Bellone (Tallinn University of Technology), Olaf Maennel (The University of Adelaide), Ehsan Malayjerdi (Tallinn University of Technology)

The safety and security of navigation and planning algorithms are essential for the adoption of autonomous driving in real-world operational environments. Adversarial threats to local-planning algorithms are a developing field. Attacks have primarily been targeted at trajectory prediction algorithms which are used by the autonomous vehicle to predict the motion of ego vehicles and other environmental objects to calculate a safe planning route. This work extends the attack surface to focus on a rule-based local-planning algorithm, specifically focusing on the planning cost-based function, which is used to estimate the safest and most efficient route. Targeting this algorithm, which is used in a real-world, operational autonomous vehicle program, we devise two attacks; 1) deviation to the lateral and longitudinal pose values, and 2) time-delay of the sensed-data input messages to the local-planning nodes. Using a low-fidelity simulation testing environment, we conduct a sensitivity analysis using multiple deviation range values and time-delay duration. We find that the impact of adversarial attack cases is visible in the rate of failure to complete the mission and in the occurrence of safety violations. The cost-function is sensitive to deviations in lateral and longitudinal pose and higher duration of message delay. The result of the sensitivity analysis suggests minor deviations of the pose (lateral, longitudinal) values as an optimal range for the attackers search space. Options for mitigating such attacks are that the AV should run a concurrent process executing a concurrent planning instance for redundancy.

View More Papers

coucouArray ( [post_type] => ndss-paper [post_status] => publish [posts_per_page] => 4 [orderby] => rand [tax_query] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [taxonomy] => category [field] => id [terms] => Array ( [0] => 66 [1] => 68 ) ) ) [post__not_in] => Array ( [0] => 13416 ) )

Kids, Cats, and Control: Designing Privacy and Security Dashboard...

Jacob Abbott (Indiana University), Jayati Dev (Indiana University), DongInn Kim (Indiana University), Shakthidhar Reddy Gopavaram (Indiana University), Meera Iyer (Indiana University), Shivani Sadam (Indiana University) , Shirang Mare (Western Washington University), Tatiana Ringenberg (Purdue University), Vafa Andalibi (Indiana University), and L. Jean Camp(Indiana University)

Read More

Reminding Drivers of the Stalking Vehicles on the Road

Wei Sun, Kannan Srinivsan (The Ohio State University)

Read More

A Cross-Verification Approach with Publicly Available Map for Detecting...

Takami Sato, Ningfei Wang (University of California, Irvine), Yueqiang Cheng (NIO Security Research), Qi Alfred Chen (University of California, Irvine)

Read More

Privacy Starts with UI: Privacy Patterns and Designer Perspectives in UI/UX Practice

Anxhela Maloku (Technical University of Munich), Alexandra Klymenko (Technical University of Munich), Stephen Meisenbacher (Technical University of Munich), Florian Matthes (Technical University of Munich)

Vision: Profiling Human Attackers: Personality and Behavioral Patterns in Deceptive Multi-Stage CTF Challenges

Khalid Alasiri (School of Computing and Augmented Intelligence Arizona State University), Rakibul Hasan (School of Computing and Augmented Intelligence Arizona State University)

From Underground to Mainstream Marketplaces: Measuring AI-Enabled NSFW Deepfakes on Fiverr

Mohamed Moustafa Dawoud (University of California, Santa Cruz), Alejandro Cuevas (Princeton University), Ram Sundara Raman (University of California, Santa Cruz)