Jim Alves-Foss, Varsha Venugopal (University of Idaho)

The effectiveness of binary analysis tools and techniques is often measured with respect to how well they map to a ground truth. We have found that not all ground truths are created equal. This paper challenges the binary analysis community to take a long look at the concept of ground truth, to ensure that we are in agreement with definition(s) of ground truth, so that we can be confident in the evaluation of tools and techniques. This becomes even more important as we move to trained machine learning models, which are only as useful as the validity of the ground truth in the training.

View More Papers

Mnemocrypt

André Pacteau, Antonino Vitale, Davide Balzarotti, Simone Aonzo (EURECOM)

Read More

It Doesn’t Have to Be So Hard: Efficient Symbolic...

Vaibhav Sharma (University of Minnesota), Navid Emamdoost (University of Minnesota), Seonmo Kim (University of Minnesota), Stephen McCamant (University of Minnesota)

Read More

PISE: Protocol Inference using Symbolic Execution and Automata Learning

Ron Marcovich, Orna Grumberg, Gabi Nakibly (Technion, Israel Institute of Technology)

Read More

Demo #1: Security of Multi-Sensor Fusion based Perception in...

Yulong Cao (University of Michigan), Ningfei Wang (UC, Irvine), Chaowei Xiao (Arizona State University), Dawei Yang (University of Michigan), Jin Fang (Baidu Research), Ruigang Yang (University of Michigan), Qi Alfred Chen (UC, Irvine), Mingyan Liu (University of Michigan) and Bo Li (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)

Read More