Jim Alves-Foss, Varsha Venugopal (University of Idaho)

The effectiveness of binary analysis tools and techniques is often measured with respect to how well they map to a ground truth. We have found that not all ground truths are created equal. This paper challenges the binary analysis community to take a long look at the concept of ground truth, to ensure that we are in agreement with definition(s) of ground truth, so that we can be confident in the evaluation of tools and techniques. This becomes even more important as we move to trained machine learning models, which are only as useful as the validity of the ground truth in the training.

View More Papers

Binary Mutation Analysis of Tests Using Reassembleable Disassembly

Navid Emamdoost (University of Minnesota), Vaibhav Sharma (University of Minnesota), Taejoon Byun (University of Minnesota), Stephen McCamant (University of Minnesota)

Read More

Semantic-Informed Driver Fuzzing Without Both the Hardware Devices and...

Wenjia Zhao (Xi'an Jiaotong University and University of Minnesota), Kangjie Lu (University of Minnesota), Qiushi Wu (University of Minnesota), Yong Qi (Xi'an Jiaotong University)

Read More

Demo #9: Dynamic Time Warping as a Tool for...

Mars Rayno (Colorado State University) and Jeremy Daily (Colorado State University)

Read More

MIRROR: Model Inversion for Deep LearningNetwork with High Fidelity

Shengwei An (Purdue University), Guanhong Tao (Purdue University), Qiuling Xu (Purdue University), Yingqi Liu (Purdue University), Guangyu Shen (Purdue University); Yuan Yao (Nanjing University), Jingwei Xu (Nanjing University), Xiangyu Zhang (Purdue University)

Read More