Jim Alves-Foss, Varsha Venugopal (University of Idaho)

The effectiveness of binary analysis tools and techniques is often measured with respect to how well they map to a ground truth. We have found that not all ground truths are created equal. This paper challenges the binary analysis community to take a long look at the concept of ground truth, to ensure that we are in agreement with definition(s) of ground truth, so that we can be confident in the evaluation of tools and techniques. This becomes even more important as we move to trained machine learning models, which are only as useful as the validity of the ground truth in the training.

View More Papers

Hybrid Trust Multi-party Computation with Trusted Execution Environment

Pengfei Wu (School of Computing, National University of Singapore), Jianting Ning (College of Computer and Cyber Security, Fujian Normal University; Institute of Information Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Jiamin Shen (School of Computing, National University of Singapore), Hongbing Wang (School of Computing, National University of Singapore), Ee-Chien Chang (School of Computing, National University of Singapore)

Read More

FitM: Binary-Only Coverage-GuidedFuzzing for Stateful Network Protocols

Dominik Maier, Otto Bittner, Marc Munier, Julian Beier (TU Berlin)

Read More

Evaluating Disassembly Ground Truth Through Dynamic Tracing (abstract)

Lambang Akbar (National University of Singapore), Yuancheng Jiang (National University of Singapore), Roland H.C. Yap (National University of Singapore), Zhenkai Liang (National University of Singapore), Zhuohao Liu (National University of Singapore)

Read More

Evaluating Susceptibility of VPN Implementations to DoS Attacks Using...

Fabio Streun (ETH Zurich), Joel Wanner (ETH Zurich), Adrian Perrig (ETH Zurich)

Read More