Jim Alves-Foss, Varsha Venugopal (University of Idaho)

The effectiveness of binary analysis tools and techniques is often measured with respect to how well they map to a ground truth. We have found that not all ground truths are created equal. This paper challenges the binary analysis community to take a long look at the concept of ground truth, to ensure that we are in agreement with definition(s) of ground truth, so that we can be confident in the evaluation of tools and techniques. This becomes even more important as we move to trained machine learning models, which are only as useful as the validity of the ground truth in the training.

View More Papers

Log4shell: Redefining the Web Attack Surface

Douglas Everson (Clemson University), Long Cheng (Clemson University), and Zhenkai Zhang (Clemson University)

Read More

Demo #6: Attacks on CAN Error Handling Mechanism

Khaled Serag (Purdue University), Vireshwar Kumar (IIT Delhi), Z. Berkay Celik (Purdue University), Rohit Bhatia (Purdue University), Mathias Payer (EPFL) and Dongyan Xu (Purdue University)

Read More

A Framework for Consistent and Repeatable Controller Area Network...

Paul Agbaje (University of Texas at Arlington), Afia Anjum (University of Texas at Arlington), Arkajyoti Mitra (University of Texas at Arlington), Gedare Bloom (University of Colorado Colorado Springs) and Habeeb Olufowobi (University of Texas at Arlington)

Read More

Detecting CAN Masquerade Attacks with Signal Clustering Similarity

Pablo Moriano (Oak Ridge National Laboratory), Robert A. Bridges (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) and Michael D. Iannacone (Oak Ridge National Laboratory)

Read More