Jim Alves-Foss, Varsha Venugopal (University of Idaho)

The effectiveness of binary analysis tools and techniques is often measured with respect to how well they map to a ground truth. We have found that not all ground truths are created equal. This paper challenges the binary analysis community to take a long look at the concept of ground truth, to ensure that we are in agreement with definition(s) of ground truth, so that we can be confident in the evaluation of tools and techniques. This becomes even more important as we move to trained machine learning models, which are only as useful as the validity of the ground truth in the training.

View More Papers

Reflections on Artifact Evaluation

Dr. Eric Eide (University of Utah)

Read More

Towards a TEE-based V2V Protocol for Connected and Autonomous...

Mohit Kumar Jangid (Ohio State University) and Zhiqiang Lin (Ohio State University)

Read More

FedCRI: Federated Mobile Cyber-Risk Intelligence

Hossein Fereidooni (Technical University of Darmstadt), Alexandra Dmitrienko (University of Wuerzburg), Phillip Rieger (Technical University of Darmstadt), Markus Miettinen (Technical University of Darmstadt), Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi (Technical University of Darmstadt), Felix Madlener (KOBIL)

Read More

P4DDPI: Securing P4-Programmable Data Plane Networks via DNS Deep...

Ali AlSabeh (University of South Carolina), Elie Kfoury (University of South Carolina), Jorge Crichigno (University of South Carolina) and Elias Bou-Harb (University of Texas at San Antonio)

Read More