Jim Alves-Foss, Varsha Venugopal (University of Idaho)

The effectiveness of binary analysis tools and techniques is often measured with respect to how well they map to a ground truth. We have found that not all ground truths are created equal. This paper challenges the binary analysis community to take a long look at the concept of ground truth, to ensure that we are in agreement with definition(s) of ground truth, so that we can be confident in the evaluation of tools and techniques. This becomes even more important as we move to trained machine learning models, which are only as useful as the validity of the ground truth in the training.

View More Papers

The hard things about analyzing 1’s and 0’s...

Dr. David Brumley, Carnegie Mellon University - ForAllSecure

Read More

datAFLow: Towards a Data-Flow-Guided Fuzzer

Adrian Herrera (Australian National University), Mathias Payer (EPFL), Antony Hosking (Australian National University)

Read More

Dissecting American Fuzzy Lop – A FuzzBench Evaluation

Andrea Fioraldi (EURECOM), Alessandro Mantovani (EURECOM), Dominik Maier (TU Berlin), Davide Balzarotti (EURECOM)

Read More

dewolf: Improving Decompilation by leveraging User Surveys

Steffen Enders, Eva-Maria C. Behner, Niklas Bergmann, Mariia Rybalka, Elmar Padilla (Fraunhofer FKIE, Germany), Er Xue Hui, Henry Low, Nicholas Sim (DSO National Laboratories, Singapore)

Read More