Jim Alves-Foss, Varsha Venugopal (University of Idaho)

The effectiveness of binary analysis tools and techniques is often measured with respect to how well they map to a ground truth. We have found that not all ground truths are created equal. This paper challenges the binary analysis community to take a long look at the concept of ground truth, to ensure that we are in agreement with definition(s) of ground truth, so that we can be confident in the evaluation of tools and techniques. This becomes even more important as we move to trained machine learning models, which are only as useful as the validity of the ground truth in the training.

View More Papers

dewolf: Improving Decompilation by leveraging User Surveys

Steffen Enders, Eva-Maria C. Behner, Niklas Bergmann, Mariia Rybalka, Elmar Padilla (Fraunhofer FKIE, Germany), Er Xue Hui, Henry Low, Nicholas Sim (DSO National Laboratories, Singapore)

Read More

Evaluating Disassembly Ground Truth Through Dynamic Tracing (abstract)

Lambang Akbar (National University of Singapore), Yuancheng Jiang (National University of Singapore), Roland H.C. Yap (National University of Singapore), Zhenkai Liang (National University of Singapore), Zhuohao Liu (National University of Singapore)

Read More

F-PKI: Enabling Innovation and Trust Flexibility in the HTTPS...

Laurent Chuat (ETH Zurich), Cyrill Krähenbühl (ETH Zürich), Prateek Mittal (Princeton University), Adrian Perrig (ETH Zurich)

Read More

All things Binary

Dr. Sergey Bratus, DARPA PI and Research Associate Professor at Dartmouth College

Read More