Jim Alves-Foss, Varsha Venugopal (University of Idaho)

The effectiveness of binary analysis tools and techniques is often measured with respect to how well they map to a ground truth. We have found that not all ground truths are created equal. This paper challenges the binary analysis community to take a long look at the concept of ground truth, to ensure that we are in agreement with definition(s) of ground truth, so that we can be confident in the evaluation of tools and techniques. This becomes even more important as we move to trained machine learning models, which are only as useful as the validity of the ground truth in the training.

View More Papers

The hard things about analyzing 1’s and 0’s...

Dr. David Brumley, Carnegie Mellon University - ForAllSecure

Read More

EMS: History-Driven Mutation for Coverage-based Fuzzing

Chenyang Lyu (Zhejiang University), Shouling Ji (Zhejiang University), Xuhong Zhang (Zhejiang University & Zhejiang University NGICS Platform), Hong Liang (Zhejiang University), Binbin Zhao (Georgia Institute of Technology), Kangjie Lu (University of Minnesota), Raheem Beyah (Georgia Institute of Technology)

Read More

EqualNet: A Secure and Practical Defense for Long-term Network...

Jinwoo Kim (KAIST), Eduard Marin (Telefonica Research (Spain)), Mauro Conti (University of Padua), Seungwon Shin (KAIST)

Read More

Dissecting American Fuzzy Lop – A FuzzBench Evaluation

Andrea Fioraldi (EURECOM), Alessandro Mantovani (EURECOM), Dominik Maier (TU Berlin), Davide Balzarotti (EURECOM)

Read More