Sergey Frolov (University of Colorado Boulder), Jack Wampler (University of Colorado Boulder), Eric Wustrow (University of Colorado Boulder)

Censorship circumvention proxies have to resist active probing attempts, where censors connect to suspected servers and attempt to communicate using known proxy protocols. If the server responds in a way that reveals it is a proxy, the censor can block it with minimal collateral risk to other non-proxy services. Censors such as the Great Firewall of China have previously been observed using basic forms of this technique to find and block proxy servers as soon as they are used. In response, circumventors have created new “probe-resistant” proxy protocols, including obfs4, Shadowsocks, and Lampshade, that attempt to prevent censors from discovering them. These proxies require knowledge of a secret in order to use, and the servers remain silent when probed by a censor that doesn’t have the secret in an attempt to make it more difficult for censors to detect them.

In this paper, we identify ways that censors can still distinguish such probe-resistant proxies from other innocuous hosts on the Internet, despite their design. We discover unique TCP behaviors of five probe-resistant protocols used in popular circumvention software that could allow censors to effectively confirm suspected proxies with minimal false positives. We evaluate and analyze our attacks on hundreds of thousands of servers collected from a 10 Gbps university ISP vantage point over several days as well as active scanning using ZMap. We find that our attacks are able to efficiently identify proxy servers with only a handful of probing connections, with negligible false positives. Using our datasets, we also suggest defenses to these attacks that make it harder for censors to distinguish proxies from other common servers, and we work with proxy developers to implement these changes in several popular circumvention tools.

View More Papers

Automated Discovery of Cross-Plane Event-Based Vulnerabilities in Software-Defined Networking

Benjamin E. Ujcich (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), Samuel Jero (MIT Lincoln Laboratory), Richard Skowyra (MIT Lincoln Laboratory), Steven R. Gomez (MIT Lincoln Laboratory), Adam Bates (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), William H. Sanders (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign), Hamed Okhravi (MIT Lincoln Laboratory)

Read More

EASI: Edge-Based Sender Identification on Resource-Constrained Platforms for Automotive...

Marcel Kneib (Robert Bosch GmbH), Oleg Schell (Bosch Engineering GmbH), Christopher Huth (Robert Bosch GmbH)

Read More

DefRec: Establishing Physical Function Virtualization to Disrupt Reconnaissance of...

Hui Lin (University of Nevada, Reno), Jianing Zhuang (University of Nevada, Reno), Yih-Chun Hu (University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign), Huayu Zhou (University of Nevada, Reno)

Read More

A Practical Approach for Taking Down Avalanche Botnets Under...

Victor Le Pochat (imec-DistriNet, KU Leuven), Tim Van hamme (imec-DistriNet, KU Leuven), Sourena Maroofi (Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LIG), Tom Van Goethem (imec-DistriNet, KU Leuven), Davy Preuveneers (imec-DistriNet, KU Leuven), Andrzej Duda (Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LIG), Wouter Joosen (imec-DistriNet, KU Leuven), Maciej Korczyński (Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Grenoble INP, LIG)

Read More